“And in South America tonight, an environmental problem of a much greater magnitude.
” “The destruction of the Amazon rainforest.
” “A worldwide disaster.
” In the 1980s, the world learned that the Amazon was in danger.
“Trees are falling at a startling rate.
” “77, 000 square miles.
an area twice the size of Belgium.
the size of New York State.
the size of California, disappears.
” And why it was so important to save it.
“One-fifth of the oxygen we breathe.
” “20% of the world’s fresh water.
” “Half of the species of life on earth is in these forests.
An ecosystem the entire world needs for its survival.
” By the 1990s, it seemed like it was too late.
“The destruction accelerates.
” “More than twice as fast as previously believed.
” “Virtually impossible to control.
” “Once it is gone, it is gone forever.
” Then, something changed: “The annual destruction rate of the Amazon rainforest has dropped.
” “The lowest rate of deforestation since records began.
” “The Amazon could achieve the end of deforestation.
A huge accomplishment.
” But in order to keep it safe, therewas one condition: “Protecting the forest is a continual process.
” “Brazil will need to stay vigilant.
” But it didn’t.
“The Amazon is burning.
” “Consumed by fire.
” “Fires have been raging.
” “Thousands of fires are blazing.
as more and more trees are cut down.
” “Deforestation of the Amazon rainforest hit its highest rate in a decade.
” Today, the Amazon is being destroyed, all over again.
The question is: Can it be saved this time? The first wave of deforestation started inthe 1970s.
That’s when Brazil’s military regime sawthe potential for profit deep in the Amazon.
There were almost 5 million square kilometersof rainforest filled with natural resources.
“Amazonia’s ores and minerals, food, fiber, and forest resources are vast.
” But most of it was inaccessible.
So the government started building the Trans-Amazonian Highway an ambitious project that would run for 3200 kilometers connecting remoteparts of the rainforest.
At the time, most of Brazil’s population lived in the southeast; in cities like Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo.
And the government wanted to move people outhere – to cultivate the land and grow the economy.
So they offered free land along the highwayand paid Brazilians to settle deeper in the rainforest.
And they sparked a land rush.
As the road advanced, settlers followed, rapidly clearing the forest around it.
Most of them turned the land into pasture, where they raised cows to sell as beef.
And when these ranchers needed more land, they seized another plot, cleared it, and moved their cattle in.
This expansion deeper into the Amazon drove up deforestation.
Between 1978 and 1988, an average of over 20, 000square kilometers were cut down each year.
Over time this area became known as the Arcof Deforestation.
And soon, a different product pushed thiseven further.
People around the world were eating more meat, decade after decade.
That trend raised the need for more soybeans; which served as high-protein feed for farmed animals.
This created a huge opportunityfor countries most suitable for growing soybeans, and Brazil cashed in.
Soybean exports from Brazil shot up in themid ’90s, boosting the economy.
By the early 2000s, farmers took over thesepastures and turned them into massive soy farms.
Like this one, in Acre state.
And the ranchers who sold their pastures, moved their cattle further into the rainforest, clearing more of the Amazon, often illegally.
This aggressive expansion created a profitablepattern in the Amazon.
But it came at the cost of the rainforest.
By the early 2000s, Brazil’s beef and soyindustries were driving a booming economy, as well as unprecedented rates of deforestation.
Which caused this arc to expand further north.
The staggering deforestation in the Amazonattracted fierce resistance from environmental groups.
“An area of ancient forest, the size of a football field is destroyed every two seconds.
” The Brazilian government, under presidentLula da Silva, finally stepped in.
This is Marina Silva.
She was Brazil’s Environment Minister in 2003, when she helped craft a plan to stop deforestation.
It started with the government expanding the amount of rainforest under protection.
At the time, only about 28% was protected, and there was very little oversight.
But this new plan added more reserves, where business activities were strictly banned, and also created more sustainable-use reserves, where some businesses, like Brazillian nut harvesting and rubber-tapping, which didn’t destroy the rainforest, were allowed.
More land was also demarcated for indigenouspeople, who preserved the forest.
Over time, hundreds of new protected landswere added, transforming the Amazon into a shared and sustainable space.
Eventually, almost half the Amazon would beput under some form of protection, while the rest of it remained a mix of pasture, farms and rainforest.
To prevent further deforestation here, the government strengthened the Forest Code: which said landowners couldonly clear 20% of their private land.
This law was monitored by the Forest Service, which was part of the Environmental Ministry, which had jurisdiction over all of these protected lands.
And the key to enforcing this entire planwas strengthening IBAMA: a police agency that would track and fine people for illegal deforestation.
And the plan showed results: with deforestation rates falling by more than half in 2006.
At the same time, an activist movement wasforcing the agricultural industry to make a change.
Major food companies started feeling pressurefrom consumers for participating in deforestation.
So several got together, and in 2006, signed a Soy Moratorium: which meant they could continue to operate within existing farms, but they wouldn’t buysoy from any newly deforested land in the Amazon.
Three years later, beef companies signed asimilar agreement.
Other countries also gave Brazil money tohelp it protect the Amazon.
Under all this protection, deforestation ratesplummeted to historic lows.
And yet, Brazil’s soy and beef industriescontinued to grow, thanks to more efficient techniques: Ranchers started growing crops on their existingpastures.
And farmers planted two crops a year on theirland instead of one.
Brazil had found a way make to Amazon bothproductive, and protected.
But there were some who still wanted it tobe a more profitable place.
The ruralistas, a group of conservative politicians who represent the interests of the agricultural industry, including farmers and ranchers, started gaining influence in Brazil.
In the early 2000s they had about 17% of theseats in congress.
But by 2012 they had about 30%.
Enough power to push President Dilma Rousseffto weaken the Forest Code, which allowed landowners to get away with clearing more land.
In 2016, they pushed President Michel Temerto slash IBAMA’s budget.
They also helped him pass a law that madeit easier for people who illegally seized land in the Amazon, to keep it.
These changes emboldened some people to seize and clear the rainforest again.
And that led to a rise in deforestation rates.
In 2018, as the ruralistas controlled 44%of Congress, Jair Bolsonaro, a right-wing congressman and ally to the ruralistas, was elected president.
On his second day in office, he transferredthe forest service, which monitors the forest code, to the agricultural ministry- led by a ruralista.
He’s also worked to systematically weakenthe Environmental Ministry.
Under Bolsonaro, deforestation has increasedsignificantly in 2019, most of it taking place in these protectedareas.
Setting fires is a common way to clear land.
And in August 2019, over 30, 000 fires wereburning in the Amazon: Three times as many as in August 2018.
Many set illegally by ranchers, farmers, andlandowners, emboldened by the government’s new stance on the Amazon.
But this time, the Amazon is unlikely to surviveanother wave of deforestation.
In the last 50 years, it’s estimated that about 17% of the Amazon has been deforested.
A 2018 report estimated that, if it reaches20-25%, the whole rainforest could start to collapse.
It wouldn’t be enough to cycle all thewater it needs, causing trees to die.
And that would release a huge amount of carbondioxide into the atmosphere, further warming the planet.
But in Brazil, many politicians and agriculturalbusinesses continue to ignore the science for the sake of profit.
Clearing the Amazon for short-term gains overlooks the fact that the planet as we know it wouldn’t exist without this rainforest.
It’s why this place was saved once before.
Thanks for watching this special edition of Vox Atlas.
This is one of three that we produced on the Amazon.
And this one was about the drivers of deforestation and and some of the Brazilian politics surrounding the current crisis today.
In the next one we’re going to take a step back in the history We’re going to meet a man named Chico Mendes who led the original fight to save the Amazon, back in the 1980s.
His story is super interesting and very relevant to today.
So make sure to come back and watch more Vox Atlas in the Amazon.